Leading science, pioneering therapies
CRM Publications

The contrasting properties of conservation and correlated phylogeny in protein functional residue prediction.

TitleThe contrasting properties of conservation and correlated phylogeny in protein functional residue prediction.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2008
AuthorsManning JR, Jefferson ER, Barton GJ
JournalBMC Bioinformatics
KeywordsAlgorithms, Amino Acid, Amino Acid Sequence, Chemical, Computer Simulation, Conserved Sequence, Models, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, Protein, Proteins, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Analysis, Sequence Homology, Statistics as Topic

BACKGROUND: Amino acids responsible for structure, core function or specificity may be inferred from multiple protein sequence alignments where a limited set of residue types are tolerated. The rise in available protein sequences continues to increase the power of techniques based on this principle. RESULTS: A new algorithm, SMERFS, for predicting protein functional sites from multiple sequences alignments was compared to 14 conservation measures and to the MINER algorithm. Validation was performed on an automatically generated dataset of 1457 families derived from the protein interactions database SNAPPI-DB, and a smaller manually curated set of 148 families. The best performing measure overall was Williamson property entropy, with ROC0.1 scores of 0.0087 and 0.0114 for domain and small molecule contact prediction, respectively. The Lancet method performed worse than random on protein-protein interaction site prediction (ROC0.1 score of 0.0008). The SMERFS algorithm gave similar accuracy to the phylogenetic tree-based MINER algorithm but was superior to Williamson in prediction of non-catalytic transient complex interfaces. SMERFS predicts sites that are significantly more solvent accessible compared to Williamson. CONCLUSION: Williamson property entropy is the the best performing of 14 conservation measures examined. The difference in performance of SMERFS relative to Williamson in manually defined complexes was dependent on complex type. The best choice of analysis method is therefore dependent on the system of interest. Additional computation employed by Miner in calculation of phylogenetic trees did not produce improved results over SMERFS. SMERFS performance was improved by use of windows over alignment columns, illustrating the necessity of considering the local environment of positions when assessing their functional significance.

PubMed ID18221517
Publication institute